HomeCompareBullhorn vs hireEZ

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bullhorn vs hireEZ

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Bullhorn leads hireEZ by 12 points.

Bullhorn sits 12 points above hireEZ under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 42 — with Bullhorn filed under ATS-integrated and hireEZ under Sourcing. Bullhorn leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while hireEZ leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Bullhorn 58, hireEZ 30 — and at an 18% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage Bullhorn holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Bullhorn is filed under ATS-integrated AI, hireEZ under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordBullhornhireEZ
Price tierHighMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19992015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 40% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bullhorn 58 · hireEZ 30

    5.0 weighted points to Bullhorn

  2. 20% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bullhorn 62 · hireEZ 38

    4.8 weighted points to Bullhorn

  3. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bullhorn 38 · hireEZ 25

    1.9 weighted points to Bullhorn

  4. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bullhorn 35 · hireEZ 38

    0.4 weighted points to hireEZ

  5. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bullhorn 60 · hireEZ 58

    0.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bullhorn 60 · hireEZ 58

    0.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +11.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +11.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bullhorn minus hireEZ.

CategoryWeightBullhornhireEZΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6238+24+4.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%5830+28+5.0
FRIA Support15%3825+13+1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%6060--
Human Oversight Design12%6058+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3538-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%54 (F)42 (F)+12+11.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBullhornhireEZ
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%1101
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%156Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain95Sources on the vendor's own domain

Bullhorn has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; hireEZ has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Bullhorn, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for hireEZ, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Bullhorn last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
hireEZ last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.