HomeCompareBullhorn vs HirePro

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bullhorn vs HirePro

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Bullhorn leads HirePro on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Bullhorn finishes 16 points clear of HirePro under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 38 — across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. Bullhorn leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so HirePro is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Bullhorn leads is Human Oversight Design, Bullhorn 60 to HirePro 55. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Bullhorn 62, HirePro 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 41% of the weighted advantage Bullhorn holds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Bullhorn is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HirePro under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HirePro is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBullhornHirePro
Price tierHighMid
HeadquartersUSIN
Founded19992004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 41% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bullhorn 62 · HirePro 30

    6.4 weighted points to Bullhorn

  2. 18% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bullhorn 58 · HirePro 33

    4.5 weighted points to Bullhorn

  3. 15% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bullhorn 38 · HirePro 25

    1.9 weighted points to Bullhorn

  4. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bullhorn 60 · HirePro 50

    1.5 weighted points to Bullhorn

  5. 8% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bullhorn 60 · HirePro 52

    0.6 weighted points to Bullhorn

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bullhorn 60 · HirePro 55

    0.6 weighted points to Bullhorn

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +15.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +15.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bullhorn minus HirePro.

CategoryWeightBullhornHireProΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6230+32+6.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5833+25+4.5
FRIA Support15%3825+13+1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%6050+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%6055+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3535--
Customer Documentation8%6052+8+0.6
Total100%54 (F)38 (F)+16+15.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBullhornHirePro
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21—
FRIA Support15%11—11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%156Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain216Sources on the vendor's own domain

Bullhorn has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Bullhorn, across 2 distinct source domains, and 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Bullhorn last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HirePro last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.