HirePro
HireAIScore rates HirePro 38 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed September 25, 2026. HirePro ranks 136 of 160 vendors rated in Screening AI, against a category average of 46. That score is drawn from 27 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for HirePro — 21 with a cited source, 6 recording that nothing was located.
Score breakdown
HirePro, criterion by criterion
Each rubric criterion is scored out of 100 on the cited evidence, then weighted into the total.
Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Weight 20% · category avg 49
30
+6.0
Bias Audit Transparency
Weight 18% · category avg 41
33
+5.9
FRIA Support
Weight 15% · category avg 31
25
+3.8
Data Governance Disclosure
Weight 15% · category avg 53
50
+7.5
Human Oversight Design
Weight 12% · category avg 56
55
+6.6
Post-Market Monitoring
Weight 12% · category avg 40
35
+4.2
Customer Documentation
Weight 8% · category avg 58
52
+4.2
Total weighted score
38.2(rounded to 38 for display)
Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 160 Screening AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.
Strongest criterion
Human Oversight Design
55raw / 100
Contributes 6.6 to the total. 55 against a 56 category average.
Weakest criterion
FRIA Support
25raw / 100
Contributes 3.8 to the total. 25 against a 31 category average.
Cited evidence
The evidence behind the score
Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence. Open a criterion to see what was found, when, and where.
Download diligence recordEvidence ledger
- Items
- 27
- Documentation
- 12
- Public statement
- 8
- Product feature
- 1
- Absence
- 6
- With a source URL
- 21 of 27
- Source hostnames
- 1
- Fewest items
- 2
- FRIA Support
These figures measure how thoroughly HirePro was reviewed, not how HirePro performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.
Article 11 Technical Documentation
4 items30
- DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026
The AI Recruiter product page names its scoring dimensions (skill correctness and depth, CEFR-scale communication, behavioural signals, code correctness and efficiency) and says each score comes with question-level reasoning, but it is marketing copy, not a model or system card.
- DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026
The AI-era Assessments page says AI scores open-ended answers on seven named dimensions (conceptual understanding, relevance, accuracy, depth, completeness, reasoning, clarity) but gives no validation data or model documentation.
- DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026
A public ATS integration API guide, last updated 29 October 2025, documents the score and proctoring payloads but contains no documentation of the AI model, its explainability or its bias.
- AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026
No model or system card, explainability statement, AI policy, instructions for use or ISO 42001 certification was found in web searches, on the security, privacy and terms pages, or among the roughly 450 pages in the hirepro.in sitemap.
Bias Audit Transparency
3 items33
- Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026
HirePro says every AI Recruiter model is tested across 'ten facets of recruitment ethics', including bias on protected attributes, and calls its evaluations bias-free across gender, race, age and accent, but it names no auditor, method, date or results.
- Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026
A case study reports that AI interview evaluations agreed with recruiter assessments more than 95% of the time across 8,000+ interviews, an accuracy figure with no subgroup or adverse-impact breakdown.
https://hirepro.in/resources/case-studies/global-it-services-leader-scaled-tech-hiring-ai-interviews
- AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026
No NYC LL 144 bias-audit summary or independent audit was found: hirepro.in has none, the ACLU's crowd-sourced LL 144 audit tracker has no HirePro entry, trust.warden-ai.com/hirepro returns 404, and searches pairing HirePro with BABL AI, Holistic AI, Warden AI or FairNow return nothing.
FRIA Support
2 items25
- AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026
No EU AI Act Article 26/27 deployer guidance or FRIA template was found in web searches, on the sitemap, AI Recruiter, security, privacy or terms pages of hirepro.in.
- DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026
HirePro's EU-facing material stops at GDPR alignment and an Ireland hosting region and says nothing about EU AI Act deployer obligations.
Data Governance Disclosure
4 items50
- DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026
The security page claims independent ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification maintained through surveillance audits, GDPR and DPDP Act alignment, AWS hosting in India, Singapore or Ireland, AES-256 encryption with KMS key rotation, and tenant segregation, but it publishes no certificate, certifying body or scope.
- DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026
The privacy policy, updated 13 January 2026, lists candidate data including interview and proctoring video, audio and images and government ID, and says data collected for customers is kept as customers instruct, with no default retention period for recordings.
- Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026
HirePro says the AI Recruiter is built on twenty-five years of hiring data but does not describe that training data or list the attributes excluded from scoring.
- AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026
No subprocessor list, public DPA, training-data disclosure, input-exclusion list or ISO 42001 certification was found on hirepro.in or in web searches.
Human Oversight Design
6 items55
- DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026
The AI Recruiter page says recruiters can approve, override or step in at any stage, breaks every score down by question with reasoning, and links each recommendation to the transcript, the recording and a full audit trail.
- DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026
The ATS callback sends the AI's suspicion level first and a manual-review verdict only if the customer has taken the review service, so human review of proctoring flags is optional.
- Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026
The proctoring page markets eliminating manual reviews through AI auto-detection of fraud and logging candidates out automatically for browser violations.
- Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026
The functional assessments page lists automated warnings and disqualification among its fraud controls.
- Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026
A December 2023 HirePro blog says auto-rejection should not be allowed and advises against auto-detecting facial expressions because of bias risk, a standard the product pages above do not clearly commit to.
https://hirepro.in/resources/blogs/online-proctoring-what-it-should-do-and-not-do
- Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026
An Asite case study reports 417 profiles screened using AI and 293 shortlisted for assessments, but does not say whether recruiters reviewed the candidates who were screened out.
Post-Market Monitoring
3 items35
- DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026
The security page describes regular third-party penetration tests (summaries under NDA), continuous vulnerability scanning with remediation SLAs, real-time anomaly detection and a business-continuity plan, but no public incident reporting.
- AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026
HirePro has no public status page, security.txt, vulnerability-disclosure policy, model-update changelog or bias-monitoring dashboard: status.hirepro.in does not resolve, hirepro.statuspage.io and its /api/v2/components.json and incidents.json endpoints redirect to Statuspage's homepage, and hirepro.in/.well-known/security.txt returns 404.
- Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026
The only published contact for data concerns is the privacy address privacy.help@hirepro.in, and no dedicated security or incident contact is listed.
Customer Documentation
5 items52
- DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026
A detailed AI Recruiter product page covers the hiring workflow, scoring, fraud detection, reports, ATS and SSO integration, and security.
- Product featureCaptured Sep 25, 2026
A public API guide explains how to connect an ATS to HirePro assessments, including token authentication, candidate registration and callbacks that return scores.
- DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026
A May 2024 blog gives employers generic advice on AI policies and fair evaluation, such as regular audits and telling candidates how AI is used, without naming any law.
- DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026
The Terms of Service were last updated in June 2020, still name HirePro Consulting Pvt. Ltd., and contain no terms on AI or data processing.
- AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026
No public DPA, subprocessor list, NYC LL 144 or EU AI Act deployer guidance, or candidate-notice templates were found on hirepro.in or in web searches.
Editorial notes
Company overview
HirePro was founded in 2004 by Anshuman and Rishi Das and is based in Bengaluru. It sells hiring software and services through HirePro Technologies Pvt Ltd. Its AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews. Each answer is scored on skills, CEFR-level communication, 'behavioural signals' and code quality, and a check of more than 30 signals looks for fraud and confirms identity. HirePro also sells proctored aptitude, coding, functional and psychometric tests, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows, and it focuses heavily on campus and volume hiring in India.
Regulatory exposure
The AI Recruiter matches, shortlists and scores candidates. Employers using it for New York City roles would therefore likely need an annual independent bias audit and a candidate notice under Local Law 144, and DCWP has promised firmer enforcement after a December 2025 state audit. In the EU the tool is high-risk AI under Annex III point 4, with those obligations now due from 2 December 2027. Because the AI scores recorded interviews, Illinois' AI Video Interview Act also applies, alongside HB 3773, Colorado's SB 26-189 disclosure rules from 2027 and California's FEHA rules on automated-decision systems. HirePro publishes no bias audit, no EU AI Act material and no deployer guidance. It also does not define the 'behavioural signals' it scores, so EU deployers would need to confirm they involve no emotion inference, which has been banned in the workplace since February 2025. Its public strengths are security and privacy: a claimed ISO 27001:2022 certification, GDPR and DPDP Act alignment, and hosting in India, Singapore or Ireland.
Path to a higher score
The biggest gain would come from an independent bias audit of resume matching and interview scoring, with a named auditor, a date and impact ratios by sex and race/ethnicity. HirePro should publish it together with the method and results of its 'ten facets' ethics testing. HirePro should also publish a system card that defines each scoring dimension (including 'behavioural signals'), describes the training data and lists the attributes excluded from scoring. Human review of AI screen-outs and proctoring disqualifications should become a documented default. On the compliance side, HirePro should publish EU AI Act deployer guidance with a FRIA template, NYC notice guidance, a DPA, a subprocessor list and default periods for keeping recordings. Finally, it should add a public status page, a security.txt file and a changelog of model updates.
Regulatory frame
What applies to screening AI.
Treated as high-risk under Annex III §4 when the screening output is decisive. EU AI Act Article 13 transparency obligations apply; deployers must give candidates a way to contest.
Compare
HirePro against its nearest-scoring peers.
The closest scores in Screening AI, side by side.
- Side-by-sideHirePro vs Alooba38F
- Side-by-sideHirePro vs Brazen38F
- Side-by-sideHirePro vs Arya by Leoforce38F
- Side-by-sideHirePro vs impress.ai38F
Ranking
Others rated in Screening AI
Ranked 136 of 160 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.
- #133DevSkiller39F
- #134Alooba38F
- #135Brazen38F
- #136HireProThis profile38F
- #137Arya by Leoforce38F
- #138impress.ai38F
Conflicts of interest
No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.
Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.