Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arya by Leoforce vs HirePro
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Arya by Leoforce and HirePro tie at 38.
Arya by Leoforce, filed under Sourcing, and HirePro, filed under Screening, tie at 38 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Arya by Leoforce leads 1 of the 7 criteria and HirePro 4, with 2 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Arya by Leoforce 40, HirePro 33 — and at an 18% weight it carries 100% of the weighted advantage Arya by Leoforce holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Arya by Leoforce1
- HirePro4
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency40 vs 33
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Arya by Leoforce is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HirePro under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only HirePro is in scope of
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | HirePro |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight46% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce40HirePro331.3 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight67% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce30HirePro350.6 weighted points to HirePro
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight85% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce46HirePro520.5 weighted points to HirePro
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight96% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce48HirePro500.3 weighted points to HirePro
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce54HirePro550.1 weighted points to HirePro
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -0.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus HirePro, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | HirePro | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 33 | +7 | +1.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 52 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 38F | 38F | - | -0.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | HirePro | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.