§ The result
Bullhorn leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Bullhorn and JobDiva, both ATS-integrated entries, are 25 points apart under rubric v1.0, 54 for Bullhorn against 29 for JobDiva. Bullhorn leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; JobDiva leads none. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Bullhorn 58, JobDiva 15, 18% weight), is only 31% of the weighted advantage Bullhorn builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Bullhorn
Bullhorn is a cloud-based applicant tracking system and CRM for staffing and recruiting agencies, with AI features (Bullhorn Copilot/Amplify, automation, and Textkernel-powered search and match) that source, screen, and rank candidates against jobs.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
Bullhorn and JobDiva are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Bullhorn is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Bullhorn | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 1999 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Bullhorn 58 · JobDiva 15
7.7 weighted points to Bullhorn
20% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Bullhorn 62 · JobDiva 28
6.8 weighted points to Bullhorn
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Bullhorn 60 · JobDiva 38
3.3 weighted points to Bullhorn
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Bullhorn 38 · JobDiva 22
2.4 weighted points to Bullhorn
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Bullhorn 60 · JobDiva 40
2.4 weighted points to Bullhorn
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Bullhorn 60 · JobDiva 42
1.4 weighted points to Bullhorn
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Bullhorn 35 · JobDiva 30
0.6 weighted points to Bullhorn
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +24.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +25 beside that +24.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Bullhorn minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | Bullhorn | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 62 | 28 | +34 | +6.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 58 | 15 | +43 | +7.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 22 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 38 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 29 (F) | +25 | +24.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Bullhorn | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 15 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Bullhorn has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Bullhorn, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Bullhorn last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next