HomeCompareBullhorn vs Keka

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bullhorn vs Keka

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Bullhorn leads Keka by 17 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Bullhorn opens a 17-point lead on Keka, 54 to 37, with both scored in the ATS-integrated cohort. Keka takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 6 for Bullhorn, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Bullhorn 58, Keka 20, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage Bullhorn holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Bullhorn and Keka are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordBullhornKeka
Price tierHighLow
HeadquartersUSIN
Founded19992014

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 38% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bullhorn 58 · Keka 20

    6.8 weighted points to Bullhorn

  2. 20% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bullhorn 62 · Keka 30

    6.4 weighted points to Bullhorn

  3. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bullhorn 60 · Keka 50

    1.5 weighted points to Bullhorn

  4. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bullhorn 38 · Keka 30

    1.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

  5. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bullhorn 60 · Keka 50

    1.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bullhorn 35 · Keka 40

    0.6 weighted points to Keka

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bullhorn 60 · Keka 55

    0.4 weighted points to Bullhorn

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +16.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bullhorn minus Keka.

CategoryWeightBullhornKekaΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6230+32+6.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5820+38+6.8
FRIA Support15%3830+8+1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%6050+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%6050+10+1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3540-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%6055+5+0.4
Total100%54 (F)37 (F)+17+16.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBullhornKeka
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%156Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain287Sources on the vendor's own domain

Bullhorn has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Bullhorn, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Bullhorn last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Keka last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.