HomeCompareBullhorn vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bullhorn vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

3 points separate LinkedIn Recruiter and Bullhorn.

LinkedIn Recruiter holds a 3-point edge over Bullhorn under rubric v1.0, 57 to 54, across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of LinkedIn Recruiter, with 1 level: LinkedIn Recruiter is ahead on Post-Market Monitoring and Bullhorn on Bias Audit Transparency. Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Bullhorn 35, LinkedIn Recruiter 50 — and at a 12% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Bullhorn is filed under ATS-integrated AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordBullhornLinkedIn Recruiter
Price tierHighEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19992002

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bullhorn 35 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    1.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 18% weight · 55% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bullhorn 58 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    1.4 weighted points to Bullhorn

  3. 20% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bullhorn 62 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67

    1.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 12% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bullhorn 60 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66

    0.7 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 8% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bullhorn 60 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68

    0.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bullhorn 60 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62

    0.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -3.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bullhorn minus LinkedIn Recruiter.

CategoryWeightBullhornLinkedIn RecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6267-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%5850+8+1.4
FRIA Support15%3838--
Data Governance Disclosure15%6062-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6066-6-0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%3550-15-1.8
Customer Documentation8%6068-8-0.6
Total100%54 (F)57 (F)-3-3.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBullhornLinkedIn Recruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11—31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%156Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Bullhorn has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Bullhorn, across 2 distinct source domains, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Bullhorn last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.