HomeCompareBullhorn vs Recruit CRM

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bullhorn vs Recruit CRM

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Bullhorn leads Recruit CRM by 14 points.

Rubric v1.0 scores the ATS-integrated entries Bullhorn and Recruit CRM at 54 and 40, a gap of 14 points. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Bullhorn, with 1 level: Bullhorn is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Recruit CRM on Post-Market Monitoring. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Bullhorn 58, Recruit CRM 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 48% of the weighted advantage Bullhorn holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Bullhorn and Recruit CRM are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Bullhorn is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordBullhornRecruit CRM
Price tierHighLow
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded1999Not recorded

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 46% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bullhorn 58 · Recruit CRM 20

    6.8 weighted points to Bullhorn

  2. 20% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bullhorn 62 · Recruit CRM 34

    5.6 weighted points to Bullhorn

  3. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bullhorn 60 · Recruit CRM 54

    0.9 weighted points to Bullhorn

  4. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bullhorn 35 · Recruit CRM 42

    0.8 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  5. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bullhorn 38 · Recruit CRM 34

    0.6 weighted points to Bullhorn

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bullhorn 60 · Recruit CRM 58

    0.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +13.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +14 beside that +13.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bullhorn minus Recruit CRM.

CategoryWeightBullhornRecruit CRMΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6234+28+5.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%5820+38+6.8
FRIA Support15%3834+4+0.6
Data Governance Disclosure15%6054+6+0.9
Human Oversight Design12%6058+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3542-7-0.8
Customer Documentation8%6060--
Total100%54 (F)40 (F)+14+13.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBullhornRecruit CRM
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21—
FRIA Support15%11—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%156Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain305Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Bullhorn has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Bullhorn, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Bullhorn last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruit CRM last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.