HomeCompareBullhorn vs Retorio

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bullhorn vs Retorio

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Bullhorn leads Retorio on all 7 criteria.

Bullhorn sits 10 points above Retorio under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 44 — with Bullhorn filed under ATS-integrated and Retorio under Assessment. Bullhorn is ahead of Retorio on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Post-Market Monitoring at Bullhorn 35 to Retorio 33. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Bullhorn 58, Retorio 40, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 32% of the weighted advantage Bullhorn holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Bullhorn is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Retorio under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Retorio is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBullhornRetorio
Price tierHighMid
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded19992018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bullhorn 58 · Retorio 40

    3.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

  2. 20% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bullhorn 62 · Retorio 50

    2.4 weighted points to Bullhorn

  3. 15% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bullhorn 38 · Retorio 30

    1.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

  4. 15% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bullhorn 60 · Retorio 52

    1.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

  5. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bullhorn 60 · Retorio 52

    1.0 weighted points to Bullhorn

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bullhorn 60 · Retorio 50

    0.8 weighted points to Bullhorn

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bullhorn 35 · Retorio 33

    0.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +10.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bullhorn minus Retorio.

CategoryWeightBullhornRetorioΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6250+12+2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5840+18+3.2
FRIA Support15%3830+8+1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%6052+8+1.2
Human Oversight Design12%6052+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3533+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%6050+10+0.8
Total100%54 (F)44 (F)+10+10.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBullhornRetorio
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%1111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%156Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain166Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Bullhorn has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Retorio has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Retorio sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Bullhorn, across 2 distinct source domains, and 22 for Retorio, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Bullhorn last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Retorio last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.