HomeCompareBullhorn vs SeekOut

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bullhorn vs SeekOut

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Bullhorn leads SeekOut on all 7 criteria.

Bullhorn finishes 20 points clear of SeekOut under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 34 — across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Bullhorn leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; SeekOut leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Bullhorn 62, SeekOut 35, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 28% of the weighted advantage Bullhorn holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Bullhorn is filed under ATS-integrated AI, SeekOut under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Bullhorn is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordBullhornSeekOut
Price tierHighEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19992017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 28% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bullhorn 62 · SeekOut 35

    5.4 weighted points to Bullhorn

  2. 15% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bullhorn 60 · SeekOut 35

    3.8 weighted points to Bullhorn

  3. 18% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bullhorn 58 · SeekOut 40

    3.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

  4. 8% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bullhorn 60 · SeekOut 35

    2.0 weighted points to Bullhorn

  5. 15% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bullhorn 38 · SeekOut 25

    1.9 weighted points to Bullhorn

  6. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bullhorn 60 · SeekOut 45

    1.8 weighted points to Bullhorn

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bullhorn 35 · SeekOut 25

    1.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +19.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +20 beside that +19.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bullhorn minus SeekOut.

CategoryWeightBullhornSeekOutΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6235+27+5.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5840+18+3.2
FRIA Support15%3825+13+1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%6035+25+3.8
Human Oversight Design12%6045+15+1.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%3525+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%6035+25+2.0
Total100%54 (F)34 (F)+20+19.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBullhornSeekOut
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%1101
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%156Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain54Sources on the vendor's own domain

Bullhorn has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Bullhorn, across 2 distinct source domains, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Bullhorn last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SeekOut last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.