HomeCompareCangrade vs ClearCo (ClearCompany)

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cangrade vs ClearCo (ClearCompany)

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

1 point separates ClearCo (ClearCompany) and Cangrade.

ClearCo (ClearCompany) (ATS-integrated) edges Cangrade (Assessment) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 46 to 45. The 7 criteria split 4 to 2 in favour of ClearCo (ClearCompany), with 1 level: ClearCo (ClearCompany) is ahead on Human Oversight Design and Cangrade on Bias Audit Transparency. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, and Cangrade holds it (Cangrade 35, ClearCo (ClearCompany) 28, 18% weight), worth 89% of the weighted advantage Cangrade builds across the 2 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Cangrade is filed under Assessment AI, ClearCo (ClearCompany) under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Scheduling.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Cangrade is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCangradeClearCo (ClearCompany)
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20142004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cangrade 35 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 28

    1.3 weighted points to Cangrade

  2. 12% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cangrade 56 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 63

    0.8 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  3. 20% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cangrade 52 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 56

    0.8 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  4. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cangrade 32 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 37

    0.6 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  5. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cangrade 54 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 57

    0.4 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cangrade 62 · ClearCo (ClearCompany) 60

    0.2 weighted points to Cangrade

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cangrade minus ClearCo (ClearCompany).

CategoryWeightCangradeClearCo (ClearCompany)Δ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5256-4-0.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%3528+7+1.3
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5457-3-0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5663-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%3237-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%6260+2+0.2
Total100%45 (F)46 (F)-1-1.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCangradeClearCo (ClearCompany)
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%43—41Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%32Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain42Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%2010Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain317Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cangrade has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 10 documented absences; ClearCo (ClearCompany) has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cangrade and ClearCo (ClearCompany) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Cangrade, across 3 distinct source domains, and 38 for ClearCo (ClearCompany), across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cangrade last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
ClearCo (ClearCompany) last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.