Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Cangrade vs HiPeople
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Cangrade
Cangrade is a predictive pre-hire assessment and screening platform that scores candidates against customer-specific success models built from roughly 50 psychometric traits, with add-on modules for resume screening, structured and video interviews, interview scheduling, and reference checking.
Vendor profile
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cangrade minus HiPeople.
| Category | Weight | Cangrade | HiPeople | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 62 | -10 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 84 | -49 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 58 | -4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 62 | -6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 60 | -28 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 66 | -4 |
| Total | 100% | 45 (F) | 61 (D) | -16 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Cangrade
27 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 15
- absence
- 10
- public statement
- 2
Evidence count
HiPeople
31 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 16
- public statement
- 2
- absence
- 8
- audit report
- 5