Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Cangrade vs Plum
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Cangrade
Cangrade is a predictive pre-hire assessment and screening platform that scores candidates against customer-specific success models built from roughly 50 psychometric traits, with add-on modules for resume screening, structured and video interviews, interview scheduling, and reference checking.
Vendor profile
Plum
Plum is a pre-employment talent assessment platform that uses a Five-Factor (Big Five) psychometric Discovery Survey and a Talent Match model to score and rank candidates on behavioral "durable skills" for role fit, hiring, and development.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cangrade minus Plum.
| Category | Weight | Cangrade | Plum | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 58 | -6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 83 | -48 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 28 | +2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 54 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 52 | +4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 36 | -4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 63 | -1 |
| Total | 100% | 45 (F) | 54 (F) | -9 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Cangrade
27 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 15
- absence
- 10
- public statement
- 2
Evidence count
Plum
19 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 12
- audit report
- 3
- absence
- 4