HomeCompareCangrade vs Saville Assessment

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cangrade vs Saville Assessment

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

3 points separate Saville Assessment and Cangrade.

Saville Assessment holds a 3-point edge over Cangrade under rubric v1.0, 48 to 45, with both scored in the Assessment cohort. Cangrade takes 3 of the 7 criteria, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them, against 4 for Saville Assessment, whose share includes FRIA Support. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cangrade 30, Saville Assessment 40 — and at a 15% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage Saville Assessment holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Cangrade and Saville Assessment are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCangradeSaville Assessment
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20142004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cangrade 30 · Saville Assessment 40

    1.5 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  2. 18% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cangrade 35 · Saville Assessment 42

    1.3 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  3. 12% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cangrade 32 · Saville Assessment 38

    0.7 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  4. 20% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cangrade 52 · Saville Assessment 50

    0.4 weighted points to Cangrade

  5. 8% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cangrade 62 · Saville Assessment 60

    0.2 weighted points to Cangrade

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cangrade 54 · Saville Assessment 55

    0.1 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cangrade 56 · Saville Assessment 55

    0.1 weighted points to Cangrade

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -2.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cangrade minus Saville Assessment.

CategoryWeightCangradeSaville AssessmentΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5250+2+0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3542-7-1.3
FRIA Support15%3040-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5455-1-0.1
Human Oversight Design12%5655+1+0.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3238-6-0.7
Customer Documentation8%6260+2+0.2
Total100%45 (F)48 (F)-3-2.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCangradeSaville Assessment
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%43—41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%32Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%2010Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cangrade has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 10 documented absences; Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cangrade and Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Cangrade, across 3 distinct source domains, and 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cangrade last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.