HomeCompareCegid vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cegid vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Cegid on 5 of the 7 criteria.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting scores 53 and Cegid 45 under rubric v1.0 — an 8-point gap inside the ATS-integrated cohort. Cegid is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting takes 5, the remaining 2 are level, and the nearest of those 5 is FRIA Support, Cegid 32 to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cegid 50, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Cegid and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordCegidSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersFRDE
Founded19831972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cegid 50 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    4.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 18% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cegid 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    1.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cegid 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cegid 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cegid 32 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    0.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -7.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -7.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cegid minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightCegidSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5070-20-4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3040-10-1.8
FRIA Support15%3235-3-0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5560-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5562-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%4040--
Customer Documentation8%6262--
Total100%45 (F)53 (F)-8-7.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCegidSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%61Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%61Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%336Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cegid has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 33 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for Cegid, across 2 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cegid last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.