Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Ceipal vs Greenhouse
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Ceipal
AI-powered applicant tracking and workforce-management platform for staffing firms that sources, matches, and ranks candidates on a 1-to-100 scale against job requirements.
35
FSubstantial gaps
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
67
DConcerning
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Ceipal minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | Ceipal | Greenhouse | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 78 | -48 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 86 | -66 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 42 | -17 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 46 | 64 | -18 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 46 | 66 | -20 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 58 | -20 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 53 | 64 | -11 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 67 (D) | -32 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Ceipal
20 rows across 7 categories
- absence
- 7
- documentation
- 9
- public statement
- 4
Evidence count
Greenhouse
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- public statement
- 3
- audit report
- 2
- absence
- 1