HomeCompareCeipal vs Humanly

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Ceipal vs Humanly

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Humanly leads Ceipal by 7 points.

Humanly scores 42 and Ceipal 35 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Screening and ATS-integrated cohorts. Humanly leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Ceipal leads 3, including Post-Market Monitoring. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Ceipal 20, Humanly 40, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage Humanly holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Ceipal is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Humanly under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Humanly is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCeipalHumanly
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20152018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Ceipal 20 · Humanly 40

    3.6 weighted points to Humanly

  2. 20% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Ceipal 30 · Humanly 45

    3.0 weighted points to Humanly

  3. 15% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Ceipal 25 · Humanly 35

    1.5 weighted points to Humanly

  4. 12% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Ceipal 46 · Humanly 58

    1.4 weighted points to Humanly

  5. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Ceipal 38 · Humanly 30

    1.0 weighted points to Ceipal

  6. 15% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Ceipal 46 · Humanly 40

    0.9 weighted points to Ceipal

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Ceipal 53 · Humanly 52

    0.1 weighted points to Ceipal

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -7.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -7.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Ceipal minus Humanly.

CategoryWeightCeipalHumanlyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3045-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2040-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4640+6+0.9
Human Oversight Design12%4658-12-1.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3830+8+1.0
Customer Documentation8%5352+1+0.1
Total100%35 (F)42 (F)-7-7.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCeipalHumanly
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1121Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%137Sources on the vendor's own domain126Sources on the vendor's own domain

Ceipal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Ceipal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Ceipal last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Humanly last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.