§ The result
2 points separate Cezanne Recruitment and DevSkiller.
Cezanne Recruitment holds a 2-point edge over DevSkiller under rubric v1.0, 41 to 39, across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Cezanne Recruitment: Cezanne Recruitment is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and DevSkiller on Customer Documentation. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Cezanne Recruitment 40, DevSkiller 35, 20% weight), is only 34% of the weighted advantage Cezanne Recruitment builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
§ The record
Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, DevSkiller under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only DevSkiller is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | DevSkiller |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | PL |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 40 · DevSkiller 35
1.0 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
12% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cezanne Recruitment 44 · DevSkiller 40
0.5 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cezanne Recruitment 28 · DevSkiller 25
0.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
18% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cezanne Recruitment 24 · DevSkiller 22
0.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cezanne Recruitment 58 · DevSkiller 55
0.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cezanne Recruitment 54 · DevSkiller 52
0.3 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 57 · DevSkiller 58
0.1 weighted points to DevSkiller
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +2.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +2.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus DevSkiller.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | DevSkiller | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 22 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 52 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 40 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 58 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 39 (F) | +2 | +2.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | DevSkiller | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next