§ The result
3 points separate Equalture and Cezanne Recruitment.
Equalture (Assessment) edges Cezanne Recruitment (ATS-integrated) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 44 to 41. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Equalture: Equalture is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Cezanne Recruitment on Human Oversight Design. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Cezanne Recruitment 24, Equalture 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 63% of the weighted advantage Equalture holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Vendor profile
Equalture
Equalture is a game-based pre-employment assessment platform whose short browser games measure candidates' cognitive abilities and behavioural tendencies and convert them into a Fit Score ranked against an employer-specific "Success Profile" derived from that employer's own top performers.
§ The record
Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Equalture under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Equalture is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | Equalture |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | GB | NL |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cezanne Recruitment 24 · Equalture 40
2.9 weighted points to Equalture
20% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 40 · Equalture 45
1.0 weighted points to Equalture
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cezanne Recruitment 58 · Equalture 50
1.0 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cezanne Recruitment 44 · Equalture 38
0.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cezanne Recruitment 28 · Equalture 30
0.3 weighted points to Equalture
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 57 · Equalture 60
0.2 weighted points to Equalture
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cezanne Recruitment 54 · Equalture 55
0.1 weighted points to Equalture
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -2.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Equalture.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Equalture | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 45 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 40 | -16 | -2.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 38 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 60 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 44 (F) | -3 | -2.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Equalture | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Equalture has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 26 for Equalture, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Equalture last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next