§ The result
HeyMilo leads Cezanne Recruitment on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, HeyMilo (Screening) opens a 20-point lead on Cezanne Recruitment (ATS-integrated), 61 (D) to 41 (F). HeyMilo takes all 7 criteria and Cezanne Recruitment none of them; the nearest contest is Post-Market Monitoring, Cezanne Recruitment 44 to HeyMilo 46. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cezanne Recruitment 24, HeyMilo 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 55% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HeyMilo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cezanne Recruitment 24 · HeyMilo 83
10.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 40 · HeyMilo 58
3.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cezanne Recruitment 28 · HeyMilo 42
2.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cezanne Recruitment 54 · HeyMilo 62
1.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cezanne Recruitment 58 · HeyMilo 64
0.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 57 · HeyMilo 66
0.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cezanne Recruitment 44 · HeyMilo 46
0.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -19.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 83 | -59 | -10.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 62 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 46 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 66 | -9 | -0.7 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 61 (D) | -20 | -19.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next