HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ 01 — Score breakdown
§ Score breakdown
Category scoring
Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.
- 01
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Weight 20%58
+11.6
- 02
Bias Audit Transparency
Weight 18%83
+14.9
- 03
FRIA Support
Weight 15%42
+6.3
- 04
Data Governance Disclosure
Weight 15%62
+9.3
- 05
Human Oversight Design
Weight 12%64
+7.7
- 06
Post-Market Monitoring
Weight 12%46
+5.5
- 07
Customer Documentation
Weight 8%66
+5.3
§ 02 — Strongest · weakest
Strongest category
Bias Audit Transparency
Raw score 83 · contributes 14.9 to total.
Weakest category
Customer Documentation
Raw score 66 · contributes 5.3 to total.
§ 03 — Cited evidence
§ Evidence
Cited per category
Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence.
§ 04 — Editorial notes
Company overview
HeyMilo (legal entity Redsnack Technologies Inc) is a New York-based, seed-stage AI recruiting company founded in 2023 by CEO Sabashan Ragavan and CTO Ramie Raufdeen. Its product is an 'AI recruiter' for high-volume hiring teams (staffing agencies, BPOs, franchises, and enterprises) that sources, pre-screens, and conducts adaptive voice/video/phone interviews in 14+ languages, then generates per-question scores, written rationale, transcripts, and recordings that sync to ATS platforms such as Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Ashby, Workday, and iCIMS. The company positions itself explicitly around 'fair hiring software,' framing auditability, explainability, and human-in-the-loop review as core product architecture rather than add-ons.
Regulatory exposure
HeyMilo's AI scores and ranks candidates in employment screening, placing it squarely within the high-risk category of the EU AI Act (Annex III) and within scope of NYC Local Law 144, Colorado SB 205, Illinois, and California FEHA. The company is unusually transparent for its stage: an independent Warden AI assurance dashboard publishes continuous monthly bias audits (latest 28 May 2026, sample 17,442) mapped to NYC LL144, Colorado SB 205, the EU AI Act, and California FEHA, and a detailed Responsible AI page documents human-in-the-loop design, explainability, data-governance commitments, SOC 2 Type I/II, GDPR, and EU AI Act classification work. The main residual exposure is the absence of a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (Article 27) template or deployer FRIA tooling, and the fact that core compliance artifacts (SOC 2 report, technical pack) sit behind gated trust portals.
Path to a higher score
To raise its score, HeyMilo should publish a public model/system card or Article 11-style technical documentation pack and an ISO 42001 certification rather than relying on a marketing-style Responsible AI page plus gated trust portals. It should add explicit EU AI Act Article 27 Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment guidance or a deployer FRIA template (its existing Article 14/26 blogs stop short of this). Making the SOC 2 report and Warden AI methodology downloadable without an NDA, and adding a public security.txt / status page / model-update changelog for post-market monitoring, would convert several strong-but-gated signals into fully verifiable ones.
Conflicts of interest
No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework — the consulting firm that operates this directory — provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.
Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.