Alva Labs

Alva Labs sells a science-backed hiring platform whose core is a suite of proprietary psychometric assessments - an adaptive logic (general mental ability) test, a Five-Factor Model personality test, and coding tests - wrapped in candidate management, CV screening, and structured-interview tooling.

HireAIScore rates Alva Labs 61 out of 100 (grade D, Concerning) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed August 2, 2026. Alva Labs ranks 3 of 82 vendors rated in Assessment AI, against a category average of 46. That score is drawn from 35 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for Alva Labs — 28 with a cited source, 7 recording that nothing was located.

Score breakdown

Alva Labs, criterion by criterion

Each rubric criterion is scored out of 100 on the cited evidence, then weighted into the total.

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Weight 20% · avg 50

    78

    +15.6

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    Weight 18% · avg 41

    58

    +10.4

  3. FRIA Support

    Weight 15% · avg 31

    38

    +5.7

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    Weight 15% · avg 53

    68

    +10.2

  5. Human Oversight Design

    Weight 12% · avg 55

    63

    +7.6

  6. Post-Market Monitoring

    Weight 12% · avg 38

    52

    +6.2

  7. Customer Documentation

    Weight 8% · avg 58

    68

    +5.4

Total weighted score

61.2(rounded to 61 for display)

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 82 Assessment AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Strongest criterion

Article 11 Technical Documentation

78raw / 100

Contributes 15.6 to the total. 78 against a 50 category average.

Weakest criterion

FRIA Support

38raw / 100

Contributes 5.7 to the total. 38 against a 31 category average.

Cited evidence

The evidence behind the score

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence. Open a criterion to see what was found, when, and where.

Download diligence record

Evidence ledger

Items
35
Documentation
26
Audit report
1
Public statement
1
Absence
7
With a source URL
28 of 35
Source hostnames
4
Fewest items
3
FRIA Support

These figures measure how thoroughly Alva Labs was reviewed, not how Alva Labs performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

6 items
78
  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Dedicated Safe AI page states Alva is 'among the first companies in the world to be certified according to ISO/IEC 42001', names DNV as the certifying body, links a DNV certificate checker entry, and scopes certification across the proprietary psychometric tests, candidate platform AI layer, customer platform and internal AI governance systems.

    https://www.alvalabs.io/trust/safe-ai

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Help article documents an AI Management System (AIMS) built on ISO/IEC 42001 and the EU AI Act, enumerates the seven EU AI Act trustworthy-AI values Alva has adopted, and records that Unidot audited the AIMS implementation in February 2025 ahead of DNV certification.

    https://help.alvalabs.io/en/articles/10654836-safe-ai-at-alva

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    'How AI Is Used in Your Hiring Processes' (dated 28 February 2025) gives feature-level explainability, describing LLM use for job-title cleaning and taxonomy matching, interview-question generation from personality traits, and automatic coding-test scoring against a 0-2 scorecard.

    https://help.alvalabs.io/en/articles/10681646

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    'AI in Alva's Psychometric Tests' documents the modelling stack - machine learning for response-pattern trends, Item Response Theory for item effectiveness, and Bayesian inference via NumPyro for difficulty, validity and reliability estimates.

    https://help.alvalabs.io/en/articles/10513028

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Public help-center page offering the Alva Logic Test technical manual as a downloadable PDF, last updated 26 February 2025.

    https://help.alvalabs.io/en/articles/4510873-technical-manual

  • AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    No Annex IV technical documentation pack, model card, or system card was found across alvalabs.io/trust/safe-ai, alvalabs.io/trust/science, the help center, or web searches for 'Alva Labs model card / system card / instructions for use'.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Bias Audit Transparency

5 items
58
  • Audit reportCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Personality test product page states the test is 'DNV-certified' and 'Certified to ISO 10667-2', describing this as 'Independent third-party validation of scientific rigour and practical utility'.

    https://www.alvalabs.io/hiring-system/assessments/personality-test

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Science page states Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis is performed on all items before deployment with biased items flagged, revised or removed, and cites calibration on 1.5 million candidates with full item-bank recalibration every 18 months.

    https://www.alvalabs.io/trust/science

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Product page asserts 'Personality assessments show minimal group differences across gender, ethnicity, and age' but publishes no impact ratios, effect sizes, or demographic sample sizes to support it.

    https://www.alvalabs.io/hiring-system/assessments/personality-test

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Publicly downloadable PDF confirmed as 'Alva's Logic Test - Technical Manual.pdf', linked from the help center; the PDF body could not be parsed by the fetch tool, so its adverse-impact contents could not be independently verified.

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rtSwbtF-tPJ0t0rTYJf6BLhXQbMvEgpY/view

  • AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    No NYC Local Law 144 bias audit summary and no independent algorithmic bias audit by a named auditor (BABL AI, Warden AI, Holistic AI, ORCAA, DCI, Credo AI) was found on alvalabs.io/trust/safe-ai, the security page, the science page, the help center, or via targeted searches pairing 'Alva Labs' with those auditors and with 'bias audit' / 'adverse impact' / 'Local Law 144'.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

FRIA Support

3 items
38
  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    States Alva's AI Task Force 'conducts risk and impact assessments on our AI systems' to identify how they could negatively impact individuals and communities and to explore mitigations - a provider-side impact assessment, not a deployer FRIA.

    https://help.alvalabs.io/en/articles/10654836-safe-ai-at-alva

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Assigns customers a concrete obligation to review and, if needed, correct AI feature outputs for accuracy, relevance and fairness, and provides ai@alvalabs.io as the channel for reporting AI-related harm - partial deployer guidance.

    https://help.alvalabs.io/en/articles/10654836-safe-ai-at-alva

  • AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    No Article 27 Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template, checklist, or deployer-obligation guidance was found on alvalabs.io/trust/safe-ai, alvalabs.io/trust/security-gdpr, alvalabs.io/trust/science, the help center, or via searches pairing 'Alva Labs' with 'Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment', 'Article 27' and 'deployer'.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Data Governance Disclosure

5 items
68
  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    States candidate data stays in the EU and 'is never used to train third-party models'- an explicit training-data exclusion - alongside ISO/IEC 27001 and GDPR compliance.

    https://www.alvalabs.io/trust/safe-ai

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Security page documents AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit, third-party key management via Thales with Key Access Justifications, annual external penetration testing, and a 24-month default data retention window, and links an ISO 27001 certificate and a security practices PDF.

    https://www.alvalabs.io/trust/security-gdpr

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Sets out the data categories collected, distinguishes Alva's three GDPR roles (processor, joint controller, independent controller) with the legal basis for each, and confirms processing is governed by a Data Processing Agreement.

    https://help.alvalabs.io/en/articles/14594840-how-alva-labs-protects-and-processes-your-data

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Documents a 24-month default retention clock from candidate creation with admin-configurable, country-specific retention periods and anonymisation of names, emails, test results and interview notes at expiry.

    https://help.alvalabs.io/en/articles/8989961-data-retention

  • AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    The sub-processor list linked from the security page (app.alvalabs.io/data-processors) did not render any sub-processor names publicly when fetched, so the roster appears gated behind the application; no SOC 2 report was found anywhere on the site.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Human Oversight Design

5 items
63
  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    States 'It is 100% optional to use these AI features', lets users customise coding-review scorecards and regenerate interview questions if unsatisfactory, giving concrete per-feature opt-out and override controls.

    https://help.alvalabs.io/en/articles/10681646

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Frames AI as 'built to support, not replace, human decision-making', names Human Agency and Oversight as the first of its seven adopted values, and requires users to review and correct AI outputs before relying on them.

    https://help.alvalabs.io/en/articles/10654836-safe-ai-at-alva

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Confirms ML models surface item-level trends but that Alva's psychometricians retain authority to adjust or remove test questions, keeping a human in the loop on model changes.

    https://help.alvalabs.io/en/articles/10513028

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Candidate-facing page states 'You receive the full report immediately after completing the test. It's the same report the recruiter sees. No hidden scores.', giving candidates symmetric visibility into the output used to evaluate them.

    https://www.alvalabs.io/candidates

  • AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    No per-jurisdiction compliance toggles, override audit logs, or documented candidate right to request human review of an assessment outcome were found on the candidates page, the Safe AI pages, or the help center.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Post-Market Monitoring

5 items
52
  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Live public status page monitoring the Alva App (5 components, 99.97% uptime), Integrations (9 components) and email delivery, with viewable incident history and subscribe-to-updates notifications.

    https://status.alvalabs.io

  • Public statementCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Publishes ai@alvalabs.io as a dedicated channel for reporting AI features that may harm individuals, and describes ongoing supplier and tooling review by the compliance team.

    https://help.alvalabs.io/en/articles/10654836-safe-ai-at-alva

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    States continuous monitoring of assessments with full item-bank recalibration every 18 months, giving a published cadence for model revalidation.

    https://www.alvalabs.io/trust/science

  • DocumentationCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    Documents annual penetration testing by external security experts as a recurring post-deployment assurance activity.

    https://www.alvalabs.io/trust/security-gdpr

  • AbsenceCaptured Aug 2, 2026

    No continuous fairness-monitoring dashboard, model-update changelog for assessment scoring, or published vulnerability disclosure policy was found on status.alvalabs.io, the security page, the Safe AI pages, or the help center.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Customer Documentation

6 items
68

Editorial notes

Company overview

Alva Labs AB is a Stockholm-based assessment vendor founded in 2017 by Malcolm Burenstam Linder, Peter Schierenbeck and Bjorn Strom, and reports 650+ hiring teams as customers. Its product is an adaptive logic test built on Item Response Theory and Bayesian statistics, a Five-Factor Model personality test, coding tests, and structured interviews, now surrounded by candidate management, CV screening and analytics modules. The company describes assessments calibrated on roughly 1.5 million candidates with the full item bank recalibrated every 18 months. Pricing is published as a per-job-position model across 'Grow' and 'Scale' plans (with stated overage rates of EUR 370 and EUR 320 per additional position), though base plan prices are not statically listed, placing it in the mid tier rather than enterprise-only.

Regulatory exposure

As an EU-established provider of AI systems used to evaluate candidates, Alva sits squarely in Annex III high-risk territory under the EU AI Act, and it engages that exposure more directly than almost any peer: it is certified to ISO/IEC 42001 by DNV, covering its psychometric tests, candidate platform AI layer, customer platform and internal AI governance, and it explicitly states it built its AI Management System on ISO/IEC 42001 and the EU AI Act, adopting the seven trustworthy-AI values. It also holds ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 10667-2, keeps candidate data in the EU, and states candidate data is never used to train third-party models. The clearest gaps are US-facing: no NYC Local Law 144 bias audit summary, no independent algorithmic bias audit from a named auditor (BABL AI, Warden AI, Holistic AI, DCI), and no Illinois or Colorado deployer guidance. Fairness claims such as 'minimal group differences across gender, ethnicity, and age' are asserted on product pages without published impact ratios or demographic sample sizes on the open web.

Path to a higher score

The single highest-leverage move is publishing an independent algorithmic bias audit with actual numbers - impact ratios by sex, race/ethnicity and intersectional categories, with sample sizes - as a downloadable summary rather than leaving fairness evidence inside PDF technical manuals and unquantified marketing claims. Surfacing the adverse-impact and differential-item-functioning results as an HTML page (and repeating it annually) would move the bias score materially. Second, Alva should publish EU AI Act deployer-facing material: an Article 27 FRIA template or walkthrough, an Annex IV-style instructions-for-use / system card per AI feature, and jurisdiction guidance for NYC LL 144, Illinois and Colorado. Third, make the sub-processor list publicly readable (it currently sits behind app.alvalabs.io) and add a fairness-monitoring surface alongside the existing uptime status page, so continuous bias monitoring is externally observable rather than asserted.

Regulatory frame

What applies to assessment AI.

Assessment is the most-regulated surface in AI hiring. NYC LL 144, EEOC and OFCCP frameworks, Illinois HB 3773, and EU AI Act Annex III §4 all apply, with overlap on bias-audit obligations.

Ranking

Others rated in Assessment AI

Ranked 3 of 82 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

  1. #1Maki People67D
  2. #2HiPeople61D
  3. #3Alva LabsThis profile61D
  4. #4HireVue58F
  5. #5Fuel5058F
All assessment vendors

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.