HireVue

Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
Video interviewAssessment

HireAIScore rates HireVue 58 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed May 21, 2026. HireVue ranks 4 of 57 vendors rated in Video interview AI, against a category average of 44. That score is drawn from 15 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for HireVue — 13 with a cited source, 2 recording that nothing was located.

Score breakdown

HireVue, criterion by criterion

Each rubric criterion is scored out of 100 on the cited evidence, then weighted into the total.

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Weight 20% · avg 46

    65

    +13.0

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    Weight 18% · avg 38

    80

    +14.4

  3. FRIA Support

    Weight 15% · avg 30

    35

    +5.3

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    Weight 15% · avg 51

    55

    +8.3

  5. Human Oversight Design

    Weight 12% · avg 56

    60

    +7.2

  6. Post-Market Monitoring

    Weight 12% · avg 37

    45

    +5.4

  7. Customer Documentation

    Weight 8% · avg 56

    55

    +4.4

Total weighted score

57.9(rounded to 58 for display)

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 57 Video interview AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Strongest criterion

Bias Audit Transparency

80raw / 100

Contributes 14.4 to the total. 80 against a 38 category average.

Weakest criterion

FRIA Support

35raw / 100

Contributes 5.3 to the total. 35 against a 30 category average.

Cited evidence

The evidence behind the score

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence. Open a criterion to see what was found, when, and where.

Download diligence record

Evidence ledger

Items
15
Documentation
8
Audit report
4
Public statement
1
Absence
2
With a source URL
13 of 15
Source hostnames
6
Fewest items
1
FRIA Support

These figures measure how thoroughly HireVue was reviewed, not how HireVue performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

3 items65

Bias Audit Transparency

4 items80

FRIA Support

1 item35
  • AbsenceCaptured May 21, 2026

    No public material located as of 2026-05-21.

    Where we looked: https://www.hirevue.com/resources, https://trust.hirevue.com (no FRIA template surfaced).

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Data Governance Disclosure

2 items55

Human Oversight Design

1 item60

Post-Market Monitoring

2 items45
  • Public statementCaptured May 21, 2026

    Contact paths: infosec@hirevue.com (security), principles@hirevue.com (bias / diversity).

    https://trust.hirevue.com

  • AbsenceCaptured May 21, 2026

    No public material located as of 2026-05-21.

    Where we looked: Public model-update changelog not located, No public incident-reporting channel beyond email.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Customer Documentation

2 items55

Editorial notes

Company overview

HireVue is one of the most-deployed AI-adjacent hiring tools in enterprise recruiting. Its core product is asynchronous video interviewing: candidates record video answers to standardized questions, and recruiters review them. On top of that, HireVue layers optional AI-driven assessments that score candidate responses on competencies and traits.

Regulatory exposure

Video interview platforms with AI scoring sit at the centre of the regulatory frame. Under the EU AI Act they are high-risk AI systems deployed in employment contexts (Annex III §4) - Article 11 documentation, Article 13 transparency, and Article 14 human oversight obligations apply directly. NYC Local Law 144 has required published bias audits since 2023. Colorado's AI Act applies from 30 June 2026, and Illinois HB 3773 from 1 January 2026. The category is also the focus of the in-progress Mobley v. Workday litigation.

Path to a higher score

To move into the B band on this rubric, HireVue would need to publish (a) a current bias audit per NYC LL 144 with disclosed methodology, (b) an Annex IV-aligned technical pack or system card for the assessment model, and (c) a FRIA-ready data sheet that deployers can drop into their Article 27 assessment with minimal interpretation work.

Regulatory frame

What applies to video interview AI.

The most heavily-regulated category. NYC LL 144 has applied since 2023; EU AI Act Annex III §4 treats the assessment layer as high-risk; Mobley v. Workday is shaping vendor-liability case-law here.

Keep reading

All video interview vendorsHow this score is builtAnnex IV section-by-section: what AI hiring vendors must documentWhat makes a defensible NYC LL 144 bias audit

Compare

HireVue against its nearest-scoring peers.

The closest scores in Video interview AI, side by side.

Build any comparison

Ranking

Others rated in Video interview AI

Ranked 4 of 57 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

  1. #1Maki People67D
  2. #2HeyMilo61D
  3. #3Braintrust AIR59F
  4. #4HireVueThis profile58F
  5. #5Apriora (Alex)57F
  6. #6iMocha56F
All video interview vendors

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.