Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HireVue vs Maki People
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
Concerning
Assessment
The result
Maki People leads HireVue by 9 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Maki People, filed under Assessment, finishes on 67 (D) and HireVue, filed under Video interview, on 58 (F), 9 points apart. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Maki People, with 1 level: Maki People is ahead on FRIA Support and HireVue on Article 11 Technical Documentation. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireVue 35, Maki People 62 — and at a 15% weight it carries 46% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HireVue1
- Maki People5
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support35 vs 62
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HireVue is filed under Video interview AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HireVue | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | FR |
| Founded | 2004 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight45% of the movement so far
HireVue35Maki People624.0 weighted points to Maki People
- 2
Customer Documentation
8% weight62% of the movement so far
HireVue55Maki People741.5 weighted points to Maki People
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight77% of the movement so far
HireVue55Maki People641.3 weighted points to Maki People
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight90% of the movement so far
HireVue45Maki People551.2 weighted points to Maki People
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight98% of the movement so far
HireVue60Maki People660.7 weighted points to Maki People
- 6
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight100% of the movement so far
HireVue65Maki People640.2 weighted points to HireVue
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -8.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireVue minus Maki People, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HireVue | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 64 | +1 | +0.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 80 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 62 | -27 | -4.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 74 | -19 | -1.5 |
| Total | 100% | 58F | 67D | -9 | -8.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireVue | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue and Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.