Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Alva Labs vs HeyMilo
Alva Labs
Alva Labs sells a science-backed hiring platform whose core is a suite of proprietary psychometric assessments - an adaptive logic (general mental ability) test, a Five-Factor Model personality test, and coding tests - wrapped in candidate management, CV screening, and structured-interview tooling.
Concerning
Assessment
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Concerning
Screening
The result
Alva Labs and HeyMilo tie at 61.
Alva Labs, filed under Assessment, and HeyMilo, filed under Screening, tie at 61 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Alva Labs leads 4 of the 7 criteria and HeyMilo 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Alva Labs 58, HeyMilo 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 86% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Alva Labs4
- HeyMilo3
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency58 vs 83
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Alva Labs is filed under Assessment AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Alva Labs | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | SE | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight41% of the movement so far
Alva Labs58HeyMilo834.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight77% of the movement so far
Alva Labs78HeyMilo584.0 weighted points to Alva Labs
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight85% of the movement so far
Alva Labs68HeyMilo620.9 weighted points to Alva Labs
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight92% of the movement so far
Alva Labs52HeyMilo460.7 weighted points to Alva Labs
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight97% of the movement so far
Alva Labs38HeyMilo420.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight99% of the movement so far
Alva Labs68HeyMilo660.2 weighted points to Alva Labs
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Alva Labs63HeyMilo640.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Alva Labs minus HeyMilo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Alva Labs | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 58 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 58 | 83 | -25 | -4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 42 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 68 | 62 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 64 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 52 | 46 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 68 | 66 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 61D | 61D | - | +0.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Alva Labs | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Alva Labs has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Alva Labs and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Alva Labs, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Alva Labs last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.