Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HeyMilo vs HiPeople
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Concerning
Screening
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
Concerning
Assessment
The result
HeyMilo and HiPeople tie at 61.
HeyMilo (Screening) and HiPeople (Assessment) tie at 61 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. HeyMilo leads 3 of the 7 criteria and HiPeople 3, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Post-Market Monitoring, is both the widest raw gap (HeyMilo 46, HiPeople 60) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 12% weight it makes up 63% of the weighted advantage HiPeople holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HeyMilo3
- HiPeople3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring46 vs 60
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Post-Market Monitoring12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HeyMilo is filed under Screening AI, HiPeople under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HeyMilo | HiPeople |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | DE |
| Founded | 2023 | 2019 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight37% of the movement so far
HeyMilo46HiPeople601.7 weighted points to HiPeople
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight60% of the movement so far
HeyMilo42HiPeople351.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight78% of the movement so far
HeyMilo58HiPeople620.8 weighted points to HiPeople
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight91% of the movement so far
HeyMilo62HiPeople580.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight96% of the movement so far
HeyMilo64HiPeople620.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 6
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight100% of the movement so far
HeyMilo83HiPeople840.2 weighted points to HiPeople
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeyMilo minus HiPeople, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HeyMilo | HiPeople | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 62 | -4 | -0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 84 | -1 | -0.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 58 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 62 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 46 | 60 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 66 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 61D | 61D | - | -0.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeyMilo | HiPeople | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; HiPeople has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo and HiPeople sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for HiPeople, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiPeople last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.