§ The result
Cezanne Recruitment leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Cezanne Recruitment, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 41 and HireQuotient, filed under Sourcing, on 34, 7 points apart. Cezanne Recruitment takes all 7 criteria from HireQuotient without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Human Oversight Design, Cezanne Recruitment 58 to HireQuotient 57. Even Data Governance Disclosure, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Cezanne Recruitment 54, HireQuotient 40, 15% weight), is only 28% of the weighted advantage Cezanne Recruitment builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Vendor profile
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
§ The record
Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HireQuotient under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | HireQuotient |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | SG |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cezanne Recruitment 54 · HireQuotient 40
2.1 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
12% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cezanne Recruitment 44 · HireQuotient 30
1.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cezanne Recruitment 24 · HireQuotient 18
1.1 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
20% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 40 · HireQuotient 35
1.0 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cezanne Recruitment 28 · HireQuotient 22
0.9 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 57 · HireQuotient 50
0.6 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cezanne Recruitment 58 · HireQuotient 57
0.1 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +7.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus HireQuotient.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | HireQuotient | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 18 | +6 | +1.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 22 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 40 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 57 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 30 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 50 | +7 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 34 (F) | +7 | +7.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | HireQuotient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next