§ The result
Hogan Assessments leads Cezanne Recruitment by 6 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Hogan Assessments, filed under Assessment, finishes on 47 and Cezanne Recruitment, filed under ATS-integrated, on 41, 6 points apart. Cezanne Recruitment takes 3 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 4 for Hogan Assessments, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cezanne Recruitment 24, Hogan Assessments 44 — and at an 18% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage Hogan Assessments holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Vendor profile
Hogan Assessments
Hogan Assessments provides science-based personality assessments - chiefly the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), Hogan Development Survey (HDS), and Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI) - used to predict workplace performance for employee selection and development.
§ The record
Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Hogan Assessments under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Hogan Assessments is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | Hogan Assessments |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 1987 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cezanne Recruitment 24 · Hogan Assessments 44
3.6 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
20% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 40 · Hogan Assessments 50
2.0 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cezanne Recruitment 28 · Hogan Assessments 36
1.2 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cezanne Recruitment 58 · Hogan Assessments 52
0.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cezanne Recruitment 44 · Hogan Assessments 40
0.5 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 57 · Hogan Assessments 62
0.4 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cezanne Recruitment 54 · Hogan Assessments 52
0.3 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Hogan Assessments.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Hogan Assessments | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 50 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 44 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 36 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 52 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 40 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 62 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 47 (F) | -6 | -5.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Hogan Assessments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Hogan Assessments last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.