HomeCompareCezanne Recruitment vs JobDiva

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cezanne Recruitment vs JobDiva

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Cezanne Recruitment leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.

Rubric v1.0 scores the ATS-integrated entries Cezanne Recruitment and JobDiva at 41 and 29, a gap of 12 points. Cezanne Recruitment takes all 7 criteria from JobDiva without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is FRIA Support, Cezanne Recruitment 28 to JobDiva 22. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Human Oversight Design (Cezanne Recruitment 58, JobDiva 40) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Cezanne Recruitment 40, JobDiva 28), the second being 19% of the weighted advantage Cezanne Recruitment holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Cezanne Recruitment and JobDiva are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Cezanne Recruitment is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordCezanne RecruitmentJobDiva
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded20122003

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 19% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 40 · JobDiva 28

    2.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  2. 15% weight · 39% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cezanne Recruitment 54 · JobDiva 38

    2.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  3. 12% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cezanne Recruitment 58 · JobDiva 40

    2.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  4. 12% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cezanne Recruitment 44 · JobDiva 30

    1.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  5. 18% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cezanne Recruitment 24 · JobDiva 15

    1.6 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  6. 8% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 57 · JobDiva 42

    1.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cezanne Recruitment 28 · JobDiva 22

    0.9 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +12.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus JobDiva.

CategoryWeightCezanne RecruitmentJobDivaΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4028+12+2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%2415+9+1.6
FRIA Support15%2822+6+0.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%5438+16+2.4
Human Oversight Design12%5840+18+2.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4430+14+1.7
Customer Documentation8%5742+15+1.2
Total100%41 (F)29 (F)+12+12.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCezanne RecruitmentJobDiva
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain12—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%256Sources on the vendor's own domain208Sources on the vendor's own domain

Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
JobDiva last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.