HomeCompareCezanne Recruitment vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cezanne Recruitment vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Cezanne Recruitment on all 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter finishes 16 points clear of Cezanne Recruitment under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 41 — across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. LinkedIn Recruiter takes all 7 criteria and Cezanne Recruitment none of them; the nearest contest is Post-Market Monitoring, Cezanne Recruitment 44 to LinkedIn Recruiter 50. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Cezanne Recruitment 40, LinkedIn Recruiter 67, 20% weight), is only 35% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordCezanne RecruitmentLinkedIn Recruiter
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded20122002

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 40 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67

    5.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 18% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cezanne Recruitment 24 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    4.7 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 15% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cezanne Recruitment 28 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38

    1.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 15% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cezanne Recruitment 54 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cezanne Recruitment 58 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66

    1.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 8% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 57 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68

    0.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cezanne Recruitment 44 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    0.7 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -15.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus LinkedIn Recruiter.

CategoryWeightCezanne RecruitmentLinkedIn RecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4067-27-5.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%2450-26-4.7
FRIA Support15%2838-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5462-8-1.2
Human Oversight Design12%5866-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4450-6-0.7
Customer Documentation8%5768-11-0.9
Total100%41 (F)57 (F)-16-15.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCezanne RecruitmentLinkedIn Recruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%256Sources on the vendor's own domain345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 70 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.