§ The result
Maki People leads Cezanne Recruitment on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 26 points between Maki People (Assessment) and Cezanne Recruitment (ATS-integrated): 67 (D) for Maki People, 41 (F) for Cezanne Recruitment. Maki People leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Cezanne Recruitment leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Cezanne Recruitment 24, Maki People 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 40% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Maki People is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | FR |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cezanne Recruitment 24 · Maki People 80
10.1 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 60% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cezanne Recruitment 28 · Maki People 62
5.1 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 40 · Maki People 64
4.8 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cezanne Recruitment 54 · Maki People 64
1.5 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 57 · Maki People 74
1.4 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cezanne Recruitment 44 · Maki People 55
1.3 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cezanne Recruitment 58 · Maki People 66
1.0 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -25.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -26 beside that -25.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 64 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 80 | -56 | -10.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 62 | -34 | -5.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 64 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 66 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 55 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 74 | -17 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 67 (D) | -26 | -25.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next