HomeCompareCezanne Recruitment vs micro1

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cezanne Recruitment vs micro1

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Cezanne Recruitment leads micro1 by 5 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Cezanne Recruitment, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 41 and micro1, filed under Screening, on 36, 5 points apart. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Cezanne Recruitment: Cezanne Recruitment is ahead on Post-Market Monitoring and micro1 on Article 11 Technical Documentation. Even Post-Market Monitoring, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Cezanne Recruitment 44, micro1 25, 12% weight), is only 31% of the weighted advantage Cezanne Recruitment builds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, micro1 under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only micro1 is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCezanne Recruitmentmicro1
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded20122022

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 24% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cezanne Recruitment 44 · micro1 25

    2.3 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  2. 20% weight · 45% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 40 · micro1 50

    2.0 weighted points to micro1

  3. 15% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cezanne Recruitment 54 · micro1 45

    1.3 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  4. 12% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cezanne Recruitment 58 · micro1 48

    1.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  5. 8% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 57 · micro1 45

    1.0 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  6. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cezanne Recruitment 28 · micro1 22

    0.9 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  7. 18% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cezanne Recruitment 24 · micro1 20

    0.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +5.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +5.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus micro1.

CategoryWeightCezanne Recruitmentmicro1Δ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4050-10-2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2420+4+0.7
FRIA Support15%2822+6+0.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%5445+9+1.3
Human Oversight Design12%5848+10+1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4425+19+2.3
Customer Documentation8%5745+12+1.0
Total100%41 (F)36 (F)+5+5.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCezanne Recruitmentmicro1
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain12Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain22Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%256Sources on the vendor's own domain258Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; micro1 has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for micro1 sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for micro1, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
micro1 last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.