HomeCompareCezanne Recruitment vs Versant by Pearson

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cezanne Recruitment vs Versant by Pearson

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Versant by Pearson leads Cezanne Recruitment by 8 points.

Versant by Pearson scores 49 and Cezanne Recruitment 41 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of Versant by Pearson: Versant by Pearson is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Cezanne Recruitment on Human Oversight Design. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Cezanne Recruitment 40, Versant by Pearson 63) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 54% of the weighted advantage Versant by Pearson holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Versant by Pearson under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Versant by Pearson is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCezanne RecruitmentVersant by Pearson
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersGBGB
Founded20121844

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 40 · Versant by Pearson 63

    4.6 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  2. 18% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cezanne Recruitment 24 · Versant by Pearson 42

    3.2 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  3. 8% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 57 · Versant by Pearson 61

    0.3 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  4. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cezanne Recruitment 28 · Versant by Pearson 30

    0.3 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  5. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cezanne Recruitment 58 · Versant by Pearson 56

    0.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  6. 15% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cezanne Recruitment 54 · Versant by Pearson 53

    0.1 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cezanne Recruitment 44 · Versant by Pearson 43

    0.1 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Versant by Pearson.

CategoryWeightCezanne RecruitmentVersant by PearsonΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4063-23-4.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2442-18-3.2
FRIA Support15%2830-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5453+1+0.1
Human Oversight Design12%5856+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4443+1+0.1
Customer Documentation8%5761-4-0.3
Total100%41 (F)49 (F)-8-8.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCezanne RecruitmentVersant by Pearson
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%256Sources on the vendor's own domain236Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Versant by Pearson has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Versant by Pearson sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for Versant by Pearson, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Versant by Pearson last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.