Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Checkr vs Paradox
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Checkr
Checkr is an FCRA-regulated background screening platform that uses machine learning to parse, classify and standardize criminal, employment, education and motor-vehicle records, and to route them through customer-configured adjudication rulesets that flag candidates as eligible, review or escalated for employment decisions.
Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Checkr minus Paradox.
| Category | Weight | Checkr | Paradox | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 40 | +30 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 50 | -15 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 25 | +7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 45 | +17 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 50 | +16 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 35 | +15 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 68 | 45 | +23 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 41 (F) | +13 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Checkr
28 rows across 7 categories
- audit report
- 2
- documentation
- 18
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 2
Evidence count
Paradox
10 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 2
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 2