HomeCompareClasset vs HighMatch

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Classet vs HighMatch

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Classet leads HighMatch by 12 points.

Classet, filed under Screening, comes out 12 points above HighMatch, filed under Assessment: 55 against 43 under rubric v1.0. Classet leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while HighMatch leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Classet 76, HighMatch 30 — and at an 18% weight it carries 68% of the weighted advantage Classet holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Classet is filed under Screening AI, HighMatch under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HighMatch is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordClassetHighMatch
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20212005

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Classet 76 · HighMatch 30

    8.3 weighted points to Classet

  2. 12% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Classet 58 · HighMatch 40

    2.2 weighted points to Classet

  3. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Classet 57 · HighMatch 52

    0.8 weighted points to Classet

  4. 12% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Classet 55 · HighMatch 60

    0.6 weighted points to HighMatch

  5. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Classet 33 · HighMatch 30

    0.4 weighted points to Classet

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Classet 62 · HighMatch 58

    0.3 weighted points to Classet

  7. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Classet 46 · HighMatch 45

    0.2 weighted points to Classet

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +11.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Classet minus HighMatch.

CategoryWeightClassetHighMatchΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4645+1+0.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%7630+46+8.3
FRIA Support15%3330+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5752+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5560-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%5840+18+2.2
Customer Documentation8%6258+4+0.3
Total100%55 (F)43 (F)+12+11.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClassetHighMatch
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%80Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%335Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain314Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Classet has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 33 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; HighMatch has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Classet and HighMatch sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 73 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for Classet, across 3 distinct source domains, and 35 for HighMatch, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Classet last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HighMatch last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.