§ The result
Maki People leads Classet by 12 points.
Maki People sits 12 points above Classet under rubric v1.0 — 67 (D) against 55 (F) — with Maki People filed under Assessment and Classet under Screening. Classet takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 6 for Maki People, whose share includes FRIA Support. Even FRIA Support, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Classet 33, Maki People 62, 15% weight), is only 36% of the weighted advantage Maki People builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Classet
Classet's AI voice recruiter, Joy, phones hourly and frontline applicants within about a minute of applying, runs employer-scripted screening interviews with binary knockout questions, and sends recruiters recordings, transcripts, summaries and a qualified/unqualified outcome, either in Classet's lightweight ATS or in 100+ connected ATSs.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
Classet is filed under Screening AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Scheduling.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Maki People is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Classet | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | FR |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 35% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Classet 33 · Maki People 62
4.3 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Classet 46 · Maki People 64
3.6 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Classet 55 · Maki People 66
1.3 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Classet 57 · Maki People 64
1.1 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Classet 62 · Maki People 74
1.0 weighted points to Maki People
18% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Classet 76 · Maki People 80
0.7 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Classet 58 · Maki People 55
0.4 weighted points to Classet
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Classet minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | Classet | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 46 | 64 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 76 | 80 | -4 | -0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 62 | -29 | -4.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 64 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 66 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 74 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 55 (F) | 67 (D) | -12 | -11.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Classet | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 33 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Classet has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 33 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Classet and Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 69 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for Classet, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Classet last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next