§ The result
Maki People leads ClearCo (ClearCompany) on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Maki People (Assessment) opens a 21-point lead on ClearCo (ClearCompany) (ATS-integrated), 67 (D) to 46 (F). Of the 7 criteria ClearCo (ClearCompany) wins none, and the narrowest lead Maki People holds is on Human Oversight Design, ClearCo (ClearCompany) 63 to Maki People 66. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — ClearCo (ClearCompany) 28, Maki People 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 46% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
ClearCo (ClearCompany)
ClearCo (formerly ClearCompany) is a unified talent-management suite built around an applicant tracking system. Its AI Talent Match scores and ranks new applicants against a requisition's skills and job titles, and its Sourcing Agent runs AI-conducted phone screening calls and returns applicants ranked by score.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
ClearCo (ClearCompany) is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Scheduling.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Maki People is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | ClearCo (ClearCompany) | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | FR |
| Founded | 2004 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
ClearCo (ClearCompany) 28 · Maki People 80
9.4 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 69% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
ClearCo (ClearCompany) 30 · Maki People 62
4.8 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
ClearCo (ClearCompany) 37 · Maki People 55
2.2 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
ClearCo (ClearCompany) 56 · Maki People 64
1.6 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
ClearCo (ClearCompany) 60 · Maki People 74
1.1 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
ClearCo (ClearCompany) 57 · Maki People 64
1.1 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
ClearCo (ClearCompany) 63 · Maki People 66
0.4 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -20.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ClearCo (ClearCompany) minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | ClearCo (ClearCompany) | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 56 | 64 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 80 | -52 | -9.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 62 | -32 | -4.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 64 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 66 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 37 | 55 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 74 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 67 (D) | -21 | -20.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ClearCo (ClearCompany) | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
ClearCo (ClearCompany) has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ClearCo (ClearCompany) and Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 69 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for ClearCo (ClearCompany), across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ClearCo (ClearCompany) last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.