HomeCompareClearCo (ClearCompany) vs Textkernel

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

ClearCo (ClearCompany) vs Textkernel

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Textkernel leads ClearCo (ClearCompany) by 5 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Textkernel, filed under Sourcing, finishes on 51 and ClearCo (ClearCompany), filed under ATS-integrated, on 46, 5 points apart. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of Textkernel: Textkernel is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and ClearCo (ClearCompany) on Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — ClearCo (ClearCompany) 28, Textkernel 55 — and at an 18% weight it carries 86% of the weighted advantage Textkernel holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

ClearCo (ClearCompany) is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Textkernel under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordClearCo (ClearCompany)Textkernel
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSNL
Founded20042001

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 28 · Textkernel 55

    4.9 weighted points to Textkernel

  2. 12% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 63 · Textkernel 60

    0.4 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  3. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 37 · Textkernel 40

    0.4 weighted points to Textkernel

  4. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 30 · Textkernel 32

    0.3 weighted points to Textkernel

  5. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 57 · Textkernel 55

    0.3 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  6. 20% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 56 · Textkernel 55

    0.2 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 60 · Textkernel 62

    0.2 weighted points to Textkernel

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -4.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is ClearCo (ClearCompany) minus Textkernel.

CategoryWeightClearCo (ClearCompany)TextkernelΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5655+1+0.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2855-27-4.9
FRIA Support15%3032-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5755+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6360+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3740-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%46 (F)51 (F)-5-4.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClearCo (ClearCompany)Textkernel
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%42Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%317Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain135Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

ClearCo (ClearCompany) has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Textkernel has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ClearCo (ClearCompany) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for ClearCo (ClearCompany), across 3 distinct source domains, and 18 for Textkernel, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
ClearCo (ClearCompany) last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Textkernel last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.