HomeCompareClearCo (ClearCompany) vs ZipRecruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

ClearCo (ClearCompany) vs ZipRecruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

ClearCo (ClearCompany) leads ZipRecruiter by 6 points.

Under rubric v1.0, ClearCo (ClearCompany), filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 46 and ZipRecruiter, filed under Sourcing, on 40, 6 points apart. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of ClearCo (ClearCompany): ClearCo (ClearCompany) is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and ZipRecruiter on Post-Market Monitoring. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — ClearCo (ClearCompany) 56, ZipRecruiter 40 — and at a 20% weight it carries 49% of the weighted advantage ClearCo (ClearCompany) holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

ClearCo (ClearCompany) is filed under ATS-integrated AI, ZipRecruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordClearCo (ClearCompany)ZipRecruiter
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20042010

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 46% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 56 · ZipRecruiter 40

    3.2 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  2. 12% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 63 · ZipRecruiter 55

    1.0 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  3. 15% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 57 · ZipRecruiter 52

    0.8 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  4. 18% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 28 · ZipRecruiter 24

    0.7 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  5. 8% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 60 · ZipRecruiter 54

    0.5 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  6. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 30 · ZipRecruiter 27

    0.4 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 37 · ZipRecruiter 40

    0.4 weighted points to ZipRecruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +6.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +6.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is ClearCo (ClearCompany) minus ZipRecruiter.

CategoryWeightClearCo (ClearCompany)ZipRecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5640+16+3.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2824+4+0.7
FRIA Support15%3027+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5752+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%6355+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3740-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%6054+6+0.5
Total100%46 (F)40 (F)+6+6.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClearCo (ClearCompany)ZipRecruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain40Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%42Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%317Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain285Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

ClearCo (ClearCompany) has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; ZipRecruiter has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ClearCo (ClearCompany) and ZipRecruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 71 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for ClearCo (ClearCompany), across 3 distinct source domains, and 33 for ZipRecruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
ClearCo (ClearCompany) last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
ZipRecruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.