§ The result
Greenhouse leads CoderPad on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) and CoderPad (Assessment): 67 (D) for Greenhouse, 42 (F) for CoderPad. Of the 7 criteria CoderPad wins none, and the narrowest lead Greenhouse holds is on Customer Documentation, CoderPad 58 to Greenhouse 64. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (CoderPad 20, Greenhouse 86) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 47% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
CoderPad
CoderPad is a technical hiring platform that auto-scores and ranks candidates on coding assessments (Screen), uses an AI reviewer to evaluate and rank applicants' asynchronous video pre-screen responses against employer criteria (Qualify), and hosts live collaborative coding interviews with AI assistance, note-taking and summaries (Interview).
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
CoderPad is filed under Assessment AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only CoderPad is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | CoderPad | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
CoderPad 20 · Greenhouse 86
11.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
20% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
CoderPad 45 · Greenhouse 78
6.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
CoderPad 28 · Greenhouse 42
2.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
CoderPad 44 · Greenhouse 58
1.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
CoderPad 54 · Greenhouse 64
1.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
CoderPad 57 · Greenhouse 66
1.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
CoderPad 58 · Greenhouse 64
0.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -25.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -25 beside that -25.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is CoderPad minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | CoderPad | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 78 | -33 | -6.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 86 | -66 | -11.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 64 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 66 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 58 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 67 (D) | -25 | -25.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | CoderPad | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 32 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
CoderPad has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for CoderPad and Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for CoderPad, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- CoderPad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next