§ The result
Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads ConverzAI by 12 points.
Pymetrics (Harver Games) sits 12 points above ConverzAI under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 44 — with Pymetrics (Harver Games) filed under Assessment and ConverzAI under Screening. ConverzAI takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 5 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (ConverzAI 30, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 58% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
ConverzAI
ConverzAI's Virtual Recruiter is an agentic voice, SMS and email AI agent for staffing firms. It contacts applicants within minutes, runs role-specific screening interviews, scores candidates' fit to open jobs and updates the firm's ATS.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
§ The record
ConverzAI is filed under Screening AI, Pymetrics (Harver Games) under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | ConverzAI | Pymetrics (Harver Games) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
ConverzAI 30 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70
8.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
ConverzAI 40 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60
3.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
ConverzAI 50 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35
1.8 weighted points to ConverzAI
18% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
ConverzAI 72 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80
1.4 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
ConverzAI 45 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55
0.8 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
ConverzAI 30 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25
0.8 weighted points to ConverzAI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
ConverzAI 45 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50
0.6 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ConverzAI minus Pymetrics (Harver Games).
| Category | Weight | ConverzAI | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 70 | -40 | -8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 72 | 80 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 35 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 56 (F) | -12 | -11.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ConverzAI | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
ConverzAI has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ConverzAI and Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for ConverzAI, across 3 distinct source domains, and 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ConverzAI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next