HomeCompareConverzAI vs SmartRecruiters

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

ConverzAI vs SmartRecruiters

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SmartRecruiters leads ConverzAI by 18 points.

Under rubric v1.0, SmartRecruiters (ATS-integrated) opens an 18-point lead on ConverzAI (Screening), 62 (D) to 44 (F). The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of SmartRecruiters: SmartRecruiters is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and ConverzAI on Post-Market Monitoring. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — ConverzAI 30, SmartRecruiters 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage SmartRecruiters holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

ConverzAI is filed under Screening AI, SmartRecruiters under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordConverzAISmartRecruiters
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20192010

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 44% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    ConverzAI 30 · SmartRecruiters 70

    8.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  2. 15% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    ConverzAI 40 · SmartRecruiters 62

    3.3 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  3. 15% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    ConverzAI 30 · SmartRecruiters 45

    2.3 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  4. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    ConverzAI 45 · SmartRecruiters 62

    2.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  5. 8% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    ConverzAI 45 · SmartRecruiters 63

    1.4 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  6. 18% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    ConverzAI 72 · SmartRecruiters 78

    1.1 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    ConverzAI 50 · SmartRecruiters 48

    0.2 weighted points to ConverzAI

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is ConverzAI minus SmartRecruiters.

CategoryWeightConverzAISmartRecruitersΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3070-40-8.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%7278-6-1.1
FRIA Support15%3045-15-2.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%4062-22-3.3
Human Oversight Design12%4562-17-2.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%5048+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%4563-18-1.4
Total100%44 (F)62 (D)-18-17.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightConverzAISmartRecruiters
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%60Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain10Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Audit reportSources on a separate domain11Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%246Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain112Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

ConverzAI has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ConverzAI and SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for ConverzAI, across 3 distinct source domains, and 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
ConverzAI last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SmartRecruiters last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.