§ The result
1 point separates ConverzAI and Wonderlic.
ConverzAI holds a 1-point edge over Wonderlic under rubric v1.0, 44 to 43, across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. Wonderlic takes 3 of the 7 criteria, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them, against 4 for ConverzAI, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — Wonderlic takes Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20%, ConverzAI 30 to Wonderlic 52, 73% of the weighted advantage Wonderlic holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Bias Audit Transparency, ConverzAI 72 to Wonderlic 48.
Vendor profile
ConverzAI
ConverzAI's Virtual Recruiter is an agentic voice, SMS and email AI agent for staffing firms. It contacts applicants within minutes, runs role-specific screening interviews, scores candidates' fit to open jobs and updates the firm's ATS.
Vendor profile
Wonderlic
Wonderlic Select (formerly WonScore) is a pre-employment assessment that combines cognitive ability, personality, and motivation tests to score and rank candidates for job fit.
§ The record
ConverzAI is filed under Screening AI, Wonderlic under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Wonderlic is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | ConverzAI | Wonderlic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 1937 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
ConverzAI 30 · Wonderlic 52
4.4 weighted points to Wonderlic
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
ConverzAI 72 · Wonderlic 48
4.3 weighted points to ConverzAI
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
ConverzAI 50 · Wonderlic 33
2.0 weighted points to ConverzAI
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
ConverzAI 45 · Wonderlic 52
0.8 weighted points to Wonderlic
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
ConverzAI 45 · Wonderlic 55
0.8 weighted points to Wonderlic
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
ConverzAI 30 · Wonderlic 25
0.8 weighted points to ConverzAI
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
ConverzAI 40 · Wonderlic 38
0.3 weighted points to ConverzAI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ConverzAI minus Wonderlic.
| Category | Weight | ConverzAI | Wonderlic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 52 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 72 | 48 | +24 | +4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 52 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 33 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 43 (F) | +1 | +1.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ConverzAI | Wonderlic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
ConverzAI has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Wonderlic has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ConverzAI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for ConverzAI, across 3 distinct source domains, and 15 for Wonderlic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ConverzAI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Wonderlic last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next