§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads ConverzAI by 12 points.
Workday Recruiting AI, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 12 points above ConverzAI, filed under Screening: 56 against 44 under rubric v1.0. ConverzAI takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 5 for Workday Recruiting AI, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — ConverzAI 30, Workday Recruiting AI 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 53% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
ConverzAI
ConverzAI's Virtual Recruiter is an agentic voice, SMS and email AI agent for staffing firms. It contacts applicants within minutes, runs role-specific screening interviews, scores candidates' fit to open jobs and updates the firm's ATS.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
ConverzAI is filed under Screening AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only ConverzAI is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | ConverzAI | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
ConverzAI 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
8.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
ConverzAI 45 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
2.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
ConverzAI 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
2.3 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
18% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
ConverzAI 72 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
2.2 weighted points to ConverzAI
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
ConverzAI 50 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.8 weighted points to ConverzAI
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
ConverzAI 45 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
ConverzAI 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ConverzAI minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | ConverzAI | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 70 | -40 | -8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 72 | 60 | +12 | +2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 65 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 35 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 65 | -20 | -1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 56 (F) | -12 | -11.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ConverzAI | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
ConverzAI has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ConverzAI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for ConverzAI, across 3 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ConverzAI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next