HomeCompareCornerstone OnDemand vs isolved

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cornerstone OnDemand vs isolved

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Cornerstone OnDemand leads isolved by 9 points.

Cornerstone OnDemand scores 56 and isolved 47 under rubric v1.0 — a 9-point gap inside the ATS-integrated cohort. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Cornerstone OnDemand, with 1 level: Cornerstone OnDemand is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and isolved on Post-Market Monitoring. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cornerstone OnDemand 72, isolved 50 — and at a 20% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage Cornerstone OnDemand holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Cornerstone OnDemand and isolved are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Cornerstone OnDemand is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCornerstone OnDemandisolved
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19991986

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 48% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cornerstone OnDemand 72 · isolved 50

    4.4 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  2. 18% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cornerstone OnDemand 58 · isolved 45

    2.3 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  3. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · isolved 53

    1.1 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  4. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cornerstone OnDemand 35 · isolved 30

    0.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  5. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · isolved 56

    0.3 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cornerstone OnDemand 45 · isolved 47

    0.2 weighted points to isolved

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +8.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +8.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cornerstone OnDemand minus isolved.

CategoryWeightCornerstone OnDemandisolvedΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7250+22+4.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5845+13+2.3
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%6053+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5555--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4547-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%6056+4+0.3
Total100%56 (F)47 (F)+9+8.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCornerstone OnDemandisolved
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain315Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cornerstone OnDemand has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; isolved has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cornerstone OnDemand and isolved sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Cornerstone OnDemand, across 2 distinct source domains, and 36 for isolved, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cornerstone OnDemand last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
isolved last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.