HomeCompareCornerstone OnDemand vs Jobvite

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cornerstone OnDemand vs Jobvite

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Cornerstone OnDemand leads Jobvite on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Cornerstone OnDemand sits 11 points above Jobvite under rubric v1.0, 56 against 45, with both filed under ATS-integrated. Cornerstone OnDemand leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Jobvite is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Cornerstone OnDemand leads is Customer Documentation, Cornerstone OnDemand 60 to Jobvite 58. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cornerstone OnDemand 72, Jobvite 50 — and at a 20% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage Cornerstone OnDemand holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Cornerstone OnDemand and Jobvite are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Cornerstone OnDemand is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCornerstone OnDemandJobvite
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19992006

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 42% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cornerstone OnDemand 72 · Jobvite 50

    4.4 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  2. 18% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cornerstone OnDemand 58 · Jobvite 38

    3.6 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  3. 12% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cornerstone OnDemand 45 · Jobvite 38

    0.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  4. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cornerstone OnDemand 35 · Jobvite 30

    0.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  5. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · Jobvite 55

    0.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · Jobvite 58

    0.2 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +10.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cornerstone OnDemand minus Jobvite.

CategoryWeightCornerstone OnDemandJobviteΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7250+22+4.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5838+20+3.6
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%6055+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5555--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4538+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%56 (F)45 (F)+11+10.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCornerstone OnDemandJobvite
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain12
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain155Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cornerstone OnDemand has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Jobvite has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cornerstone OnDemand and Jobvite sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Cornerstone OnDemand, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Jobvite, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cornerstone OnDemand last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Jobvite last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.