HomeCompareCornerstone OnDemand vs Manatal

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cornerstone OnDemand vs Manatal

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Cornerstone OnDemand leads Manatal by 15 points.

Cornerstone OnDemand finishes 15 points clear of Manatal inside the ATS-integrated cohort under rubric v1.0: 56 against 41. Cornerstone OnDemand leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Manatal leads 2, including Human Oversight Design. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cornerstone OnDemand 72, Manatal 33 — and at a 20% weight it carries 49% of the weighted advantage Cornerstone OnDemand holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Cornerstone OnDemand and Manatal are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCornerstone OnDemandManatal
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSTH
Founded19992019

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 46% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cornerstone OnDemand 72 · Manatal 33

    7.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  2. 18% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cornerstone OnDemand 58 · Manatal 22

    6.5 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  3. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · Manatal 52

    1.2 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  4. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cornerstone OnDemand 55 · Manatal 60

    0.6 weighted points to Manatal

  5. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cornerstone OnDemand 35 · Manatal 33

    0.3 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cornerstone OnDemand 45 · Manatal 43

    0.2 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · Manatal 62

    0.2 weighted points to Manatal

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +15.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +15.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cornerstone OnDemand minus Manatal.

CategoryWeightCornerstone OnDemandManatalΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7233+39+7.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%5822+36+6.5
FRIA Support15%3533+2+0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%6052+8+1.2
Human Oversight Design12%5560-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4543+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%56 (F)41 (F)+15+15.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCornerstone OnDemandManatal
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain155Sources on the vendor's own domain

Cornerstone OnDemand has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Manatal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cornerstone OnDemand sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 40 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Cornerstone OnDemand, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Manatal, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Cornerstone OnDemand last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Manatal last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.