HomeCompareCovey vs Gem

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Covey vs Gem

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Gem leads Covey by 8 points.

Gem scores 55 and Covey 47 under rubric v1.0 — an 8-point gap inside the Sourcing cohort. Gem leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Covey leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Covey 40, Gem 58, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage Gem holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Covey and Gem are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordCoveyGem
Price tierMidHigh
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20182017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Covey 40 · Gem 58

    3.6 weighted points to Gem

  2. 12% weight · 54% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Covey 30 · Gem 47

    2.0 weighted points to Gem

  3. 15% weight · 69% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Covey 25 · Gem 35

    1.5 weighted points to Gem

  4. 18% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Covey 72 · Gem 66

    1.1 weighted points to Covey

  5. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Covey 52 · Gem 61

    1.1 weighted points to Gem

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Covey 52 · Gem 57

    0.8 weighted points to Gem

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Covey 58 · Gem 62

    0.3 weighted points to Gem

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Covey minus Gem.

CategoryWeightCoveyGemΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4058-18-3.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%7266+6+1.1
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5257-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5261-9-1.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3047-17-2.0
Customer Documentation8%5862-4-0.3
Total100%47 (F)55 (F)-8-8.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCoveyGem
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0121Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%0130Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%0130Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain192Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Gem has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey and Gem sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for Gem, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Gem last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.