HomeCompareCovey vs HireQuotient

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Covey vs HireQuotient

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Covey leads HireQuotient by 13 points.

Covey sits 13 points above HireQuotient under rubric v1.0, 47 against 34, with both filed under Sourcing. HireQuotient takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 5 for Covey, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Covey 72, HireQuotient 18) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 71% of the weighted advantage Covey holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Covey and HireQuotient are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCoveyHireQuotient
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSSG
Founded20182021

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Covey 72 · HireQuotient 18

    9.7 weighted points to Covey

  2. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Covey 52 · HireQuotient 40

    1.8 weighted points to Covey

  3. 20% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Covey 40 · HireQuotient 35

    1.0 weighted points to Covey

  4. 8% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Covey 58 · HireQuotient 50

    0.6 weighted points to Covey

  5. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Covey 52 · HireQuotient 57

    0.6 weighted points to HireQuotient

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Covey 25 · HireQuotient 22

    0.4 weighted points to Covey

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +13.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +13.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Covey minus HireQuotient.

CategoryWeightCoveyHireQuotientΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4035+5+1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%7218+54+9.7
FRIA Support15%2522+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5240+12+1.8
Human Oversight Design12%5257-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3030--
Customer Documentation8%5850+8+0.6
Total100%47 (F)34 (F)+13+13.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCoveyHireQuotient
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%01—11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%01—60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%01—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain245Sources on the vendor's own domain

Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 40 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.