HomeCompareCovey vs Sense

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Covey vs Sense

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Sense leads Covey on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Sense sits 11 points above Covey under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 47 — with Sense filed under Screening and Covey under Sourcing. Sense leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Covey is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Sense leads is Customer Documentation, Covey 58 to Sense 62. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Post-Market Monitoring (Covey 30, Sense 52) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Covey 40, Sense 60), the second being 36% of the weighted advantage Sense holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Covey is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Sense under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordCoveySense
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20182016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Covey 40 · Sense 60

    4.0 weighted points to Sense

  2. 12% weight · 59% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Covey 30 · Sense 52

    2.6 weighted points to Sense

  3. 15% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Covey 25 · Sense 38

    1.9 weighted points to Sense

  4. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Covey 52 · Sense 64

    1.4 weighted points to Sense

  5. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Covey 52 · Sense 58

    0.9 weighted points to Sense

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Covey 58 · Sense 62

    0.3 weighted points to Sense

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -11.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -11.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Covey minus Sense.

CategoryWeightCoveySenseΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4060-20-4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%7272--
FRIA Support15%2538-13-1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%5258-6-0.9
Human Oversight Design12%5264-12-1.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3052-22-2.6
Customer Documentation8%5862-4-0.3
Total100%47 (F)58 (F)-11-11.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCoveySense
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain30Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%0130Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%0121Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain163Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Sense has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey and Sense sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 30 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Sense, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Sense last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.